Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI
2401.02843
85
0
Abstract
In the largest survey of its kind, 2,778 researchers who had published in top-tier artificial intelligence (AI) venues gave predictions on the pace of AI progress and the nature and impacts of advanced AI systems The aggregate forecasts give at least a 50% chance of AI systems achieving several milestones by 2028, including autonomously constructing a payment processing site from scratch, creating a song indistinguishable from a new song by a popular musician, and autonomously downloading and fine-tuning a large language model. If science continues undisrupted, the chance of unaided machines outperforming humans in every possible task was estimated at 10% by 2027, and 50% by 2047. The latter estimate is 13 years earlier than that reached in a similar survey we conducted only one year earlier [Grace et al., 2022]. However, the chance of all human occupations becoming fully automatable was forecast to reach 10% by 2037, and 50% as late as 2116 (compared to 2164 in the 2022 survey). Most respondents expressed substantial uncertainty about the long-term value of AI progress: While 68.3% thought good outcomes from superhuman AI are more likely than bad, of these net optimists 48% gave at least a 5% chance of extremely bad outcomes such as human extinction, and 59% of net pessimists gave 5% or more to extremely good outcomes. Between 38% and 51% of respondents gave at least a 10% chance to advanced AI leading to outcomes as bad as human extinction. More than half suggested that substantial or extreme concern is warranted about six different AI-related scenarios, including misinformation, authoritarian control, and inequality. There was disagreement about whether faster or slower AI progress would be better for the future of humanity. However, there was broad agreement that research aimed at minimizing potential risks from AI systems ought to be prioritized more.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper presents the results of a large-scale survey of thousands of AI researchers and authors to understand their perspectives on the future progress and impacts of AI.
- The survey covered a range of topics, including the timeline for achieving various AI capabilities, the major challenges facing the field, and the ethical considerations around advanced AI systems.
- The findings provide insights into the collective views and forecasts of the AI community on the future trajectory and implications of their work.
Plain English Explanation
This paper reports on the results of a comprehensive survey that collected the views of thousands of AI researchers and authors on the future of AI technology. The researchers asked these experts a variety of questions to understand their perspectives on how quickly different AI capabilities might be achieved, what the biggest challenges are for the field, and the ethical considerations around advanced AI systems.
The survey results offer a window into the collective thinking of the AI community about the likely course of progress in their field and the potential impacts, both positive and negative, that could arise from continued AI advancements. By aggregating the insights and predictions from such a large and knowledgeable group of AI practitioners, the paper provides a valuable snapshot of the current landscape and future outlook for this rapidly evolving technology.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a comprehensive online survey of thousands of AI authors and researchers to gather their perspectives on the future trajectory and societal implications of AI systems. The survey covered a range of topics, including:
- The timeline for achieving 39 different AI capabilities, such as human-level language understanding, autonomous vehicles, and medical diagnosis.
- The importance and difficulty of tackling 10 key challenges facing the AI field, including safety, scalability, and robustness.
- The potential positive and negative impacts of advanced AI systems on areas like the economy, environment, and human wellbeing.
- Ethical considerations around the development and deployment of transformative AI technologies.
By collecting responses from such a large and knowledgeable group of AI experts, the researchers were able to analyze the collective views and forecasts of the AI community. The findings provide insights into the anticipated pace of progress in different AI domains, the priority areas for research and development, and the range of concerns that AI practitioners have about the societal implications of their work.
Critical Analysis
The survey methodology and broad sampling of the AI research community lend credibility to the findings presented in this paper. However, there are a few potential limitations to consider:
- The survey relies on self-reported estimates and opinions, which can be subject to cognitive biases and uncertainties. Actual progress in AI may differ from the expert forecasts.
- The survey does not capture the full diversity of views within the AI field, as it only reflects the perspectives of those who chose to participate.
- The paper does not delve deeply into the reasoning and rationales behind the experts' responses, which could provide additional context and nuance.
Despite these caveats, the large scale of the survey and the thoughtful analysis of the results make this an important contribution to understanding the current state of AI development and the evolving views of those shaping the future of this transformative technology. The findings underscore the need for continued research, ethical deliberation, and proactive planning as AI systems become increasingly capable and influential.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey of thousands of AI researchers and authors offers a valuable snapshot of the AI community's collective perspective on the future progress and societal impacts of their work. The findings reveal both optimism and caution about the timeline for achieving various AI capabilities, the technical challenges that must be overcome, and the ethical considerations around advanced AI systems.
By aggregating the insights and forecasts of such a large and knowledgeable group of experts, this paper provides policymakers, businesses, and the general public with a better understanding of the current landscape and future trajectory of AI development. The results can inform strategic planning, research priorities, and public discourse around the responsible advancement of this transformative technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice
Eric Horvitz, Vincent Conitzer, Sheila McIlraith, Peter Stone
0
0
Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) will transform many aspects of our lives and society, bringing immense opportunities but also posing significant risks and challenges. The next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution. We write to share a set of recommendations for moving forward from the perspective of the founder and leaders of the One Hundred Year Study on AI. Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts to evaluate the immediate, longer-term, and far-reaching effects of AI on people and society, and to make recommendations about AI research, policy, and practice. As we witness new capabilities emerging from neural models, it is crucial that we engage in efforts to advance our scientific understanding of these models and their behaviors. We must address the impact of AI on people and society through technical, social, and sociotechnical lenses, incorporating insights from a diverse range of experts including voices from engineering, social, behavioral, and economic disciplines. By fostering dialogue, collaboration, and action among various stakeholders, we can strategically guide the development and deployment of AI in ways that maximize its potential for contributing to human flourishing. Despite the growing divide in the field between focusing on short-term versus long-term implications, we think both are of critical importance. As Alan Turing, one of the pioneers of AI, wrote in 1950, We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done. We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
4/23/2024
💬
Ten Hard Problems in Artificial Intelligence We Must Get Right
Gavin Leech, Simson Garfinkel, Misha Yagudin, Alexander Briand, Aleksandr Zhuravlev
0
0
We explore the AI2050 hard problems that block the promise of AI and cause AI risks: (1) developing general capabilities of the systems; (2) assuring the performance of AI systems and their training processes; (3) aligning system goals with human goals; (4) enabling great applications of AI in real life; (5) addressing economic disruptions; (6) ensuring the participation of all; (7) at the same time ensuring socially responsible deployment; (8) addressing any geopolitical disruptions that AI causes; (9) promoting sound governance of the technology; and (10) managing the philosophical disruptions for humans living in the age of AI. For each problem, we outline the area, identify significant recent work, and suggest ways forward. [Note: this paper reviews literature through January 2023.]
4/22/2024
🎲
Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
Saleh Afroogh, Ali Akbari, Evan Malone, Mohammadali Kargar, Hananeh Alambeigi
0
0
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in our daily life through various applications, services, and products explains the significance of trust/distrust in AI from a user perspective. AI-driven systems (as opposed to other technologies) have ubiquitously diffused in our life not only as some beneficial tools to be used by human agents but also are going to be substitutive agents on our behalf, or manipulative minds that would influence human thought, decision, and agency. Trust/distrust in AI plays the role of a regulator and could significantly control the level of this diffusion, as trust can increase, and distrust may reduce the rate of adoption of AI. Recently, varieties of studies have paid attention to the variant dimension of trust/distrust in AI, and its relevant considerations. In this systematic literature review, after conceptualization of trust in the current AI literature review, we will investigate trust in different types of human-Machine interaction, and its impact on technology acceptance in different domains. In addition to that, we propose a taxonomy of technical (i.e., safety, accuracy, robustness) and non-technical axiological (i.e., ethical, legal, and mixed) trustworthiness metrics, and some trustworthy measurements. Moreover, we examine some major trust-breakers in AI (e.g., autonomy and dignity threat), and trust makers; and propose some future directions and probable solutions for the transition to a trustworthy AI.
4/5/2024
🤖
The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants
Iason Gabriel, Arianna Manzini, Geoff Keeling, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Verena Rieser, Hasan Iqbal, Nenad Tomav{s}ev, Ira Ktena, Zachary Kenton, Mikel Rodriguez, Seliem El-Sayed, Sasha Brown, Canfer Akbulut, Andrew Trask, Edward Hughes, A. Stevie Bergman, Renee Shelby, Nahema Marchal, Conor Griffin, Juan Mateos-Garcia, Laura Weidinger, Winnie Street, Benjamin Lange, Alex Ingerman, Alison Lentz, Reed Enger, Andrew Barakat, Victoria Krakovna, John Oliver Siy, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Amanda McCroskery, Vijay Bolina, Harry Law, Murray Shanahan, Lize Alberts, Borja Balle, Sarah de Haas, Yetunde Ibitoye, Allan Dafoe, Beth Goldberg, S'ebastien Krier, Alexander Reese, Sims Witherspoon, Will Hawkins, Maribeth Rauh, Don Wallace, Matija Franklin, Josh A. Goldstein, Joel Lehman, Michael Klenk, Shannon Vallor, Courtney Biles, Meredith Ringel Morris, Helen King, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, William Isaac, James Manyika
0
0
This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user, across one or more domains, in line with the user's expectations. The paper starts by considering the technology itself, providing an overview of AI assistants, their technical foundations and potential range of applications. It then explores questions around AI value alignment, well-being, safety and malicious uses. Extending the circle of inquiry further, we next consider the relationship between advanced AI assistants and individual users in more detail, exploring topics such as manipulation and persuasion, anthropomorphism, appropriate relationships, trust and privacy. With this analysis in place, we consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants. Finally, we conclude by providing a range of recommendations for researchers, developers, policymakers and public stakeholders.
4/30/2024